Real Estate Photography – insights into pricing, budgets, goals, approaches
↦NOTE: you can jump right away to my Architecture and Real Estate Photography & Pricing page if you are looking for sample images and actual pricing.
Otherwise, the following text is more a backgrounder article to learn why pricing differs among photographers.
Pricing for Real Estate photographers in these days and this market is difficult because many clients, mostly realtors, home builders and home staging companies who order photography for the first time, can easily be overwhelmed by the price ranges they experience. As a consequence they establish a price expectation mostly based on the lowest prices they find. That’s normal human psychology, however, this article wants to shed some light on pricing in relation to quality and may be provides a real estate person with some background information what to look for and how much to pay for.
Ingredients of the overall package are certainly the photo quality, but also the photographer’s services and skills, reliability and availability.
Also, when comparing pricing you need to compare the not so obvious things like e.g. what usage rights are you getting? Is photo editing included? Sometimes it gets really confusing with some vendors.
I am offering highest possible transparency on pricing and services. For example, included for Architectural / Real Estate Photography is: HDR photography, Photoshop-enhancement, resizing (hi-res and web-use sets), color correction, perspective correction, and photos are ready to use. And FULL USAGE RIGHTS!
And if you want to discover advanced services, I can offer you add-ons and extras. Pricing details for several extras can already be found on my website or please inquire — again, full transparency.
Important to me is what my client’s goal and expectation is: I work on all projects with the same diligence, however, there are different types of projects and therefore the requirements are different.
It’s understood that a standard 120k town home has different requirements than a multi-million dollar luxury condo or estate.
One rule is the same for all levels of projects: the images have to be at least on the same quality level as the ones used in professional competitor projects, or better. No matter what object you are marketing, your buyers get their first impression by looking at the images on the web or in a brochure and the realtor / builder / seller doesn’t want to lose their interest in the first minute.
If you are in the market for hiring a photographer…. then just look at their work and their style… and may be at their prices.
Creative Style of Photographer
Style-wise you will find many differences. My style is an optimized, authentic look and one that reflects the trends in the photography industry and magazines, retailer brochures etc.
More on that topic – and why I believe that is the best for Real Estate, Architecture, and Interior Design projects – can be found in my article: Real Estate photography — the right dosis ‘Look and Style’ –or: how much editing is too much?
If you look at portfolios of some vendors you will see the differences. Especially examine if you like the ‘look & style’ and if that meets your expectations and your audience’s taste. For example, if photos are over-edited and everything from the exterior to the interior looks very artistic and unrealistic it might turn down viewers because the audience doesn’t believe the message of those photos. It is up to you (the client) because you must like it and do your best guess towards what your clientele will like. If you feel not savvy to make that decision I would suggest to go with current trends you see in the media and among brands and competitors. All that matters. If you feel that a photographer fits that profile and can create the intended style and quality then you should decide for him/her.
Photo editing is something essential and you can’t just take a photo from a wide angle lens and put it out in the wild without making corrections. It’s actually not just about the camera, it is about the understanding of some essential techniques.
Photos in the Real Estate, Architecture, and Interior Design field are meant to convey your message in an optimal form, to be believable, and to reflect the elegance and quality of the object.
What defines a quality image?
- a) the photo itself (=the photographer’s eye and experience + Photoshop Editing done on it)
- b) how the object / motif presents
If you take photos of a sub-standard, non-groomed house, nobody will later say ‘Wow!’ A kitchen with 15 year old appliances and a retro-look is what it is.
So, on the other hand, a photographer’s life is better with top-notch interiors / exteriors which are impressive by themselves. With great photos those objects can be visualized in a way the audience can ‘feel’ them and get emotional.
How to make your house look great
No matter if you have a normal home or a high-end home, there are a few things that should be done to make it look great or even greater:
- clean the house, wash the windows, declutter as much as possible. Ideally to a degree where it looks like you just moved in and there’s not much ‘stuff’ sitting in corners and on shelves, etc.
- As few personal items as possible.
- Make it appeal to a broad audience BUT do not make it GENERIC.
- nicely decorate the house, e.g. some flowers. Put a nice Espresso cup, saucer with a spoon and a cookie on a table. Make the home look warm and inviting — people should imagine to have a dinner or breakfast in that home.
- Your pet in the photo? Really up to personal preference: many potential buyers will be pet owners themselves and the will like that. Or decide to make it neutral and omit the pet. Up to you.
My view on that: pets in a photo is a definite trend for many years now in many publications, retailer brochures, etc.
- Persons in the photo? Again, up to your personal preference. Those photos can make the place more authentic, viewers can imagine ‘to be in that kitchen’ or ‘be in that house’ or ‘their kids playing in the yard’… if that is something that is of interest for you, I would recommend an upgraded Real Estate photo shoot / Architectural photo shoot which allows for more time on location.
- Groom the exterior of the house as much as possible, e.g. remove leaves in fall, mow the lawn in summer, remove clutter at those sides of the house that will be photographed, take care of water hoses, and so on
- Ask the photographer about best lighting conditions / time of day (Also see my article: Best time of day for Real Estate / Architectural Photos )
Beyond that: The photographer can try to shot only the nicest angles and can try to omit the ‘not so nice’ areas. Altogether that helps tremendously.
Pricing — insights, the low end, and when you need to invest a little bit more
A photographer should not just ‘rush’ through the rooms and take a few shots – if that is the case you have the wrong photographer and / or you have fallen for the cheapest offer on the planet. Taking good photos requires also to take the necessary time. There’s more involved than just hitting the camera’s button otherwise you can do it yourself.
The more time a photographer has available for a photo shoot the better — e.g. he/she can utilize different angles and lighting variations. Also post-processing does take some time: the more experienced the photographer is with Photoshop, the more he/she can do. If you see somewhere the really cheap photo package it might be because somebody is just hitting the Auto button in Photoshop without knowing anything else — that adds to the low-end…. There’s certainly more to the entire process but for now I want to cut it short.
Project costs can often be determined on fix-price basis which works for most single home or condo projects.
Alternatively, if projects are more complex, by calculating on a ‘per-hour’ basis, e.g. client can book ‘half day’, day, or multiple-day projects.
My Real Estate Photography pricing starts roughly around or under 200 USD*, upgraded Architectural Real Estate Photography at ~300 USD
(* for the sake of correctness, I need to state that pricing can change any time without notice and there are micro projects that may be lower in price and many other factors, … so please inquire for your project and current pricing or check out the price list on this website — I’ll be happy to provide you with a quote for your project).
However, on my website I am actually giving you the insights into pricing and my price list and I do not require you to call — all is transparent. Actually some other photographers do require you to call because they apparently have no ‘real’ price list but instead make prices on-the-fly — you probably guess why that is done. Some may say that every project is different, which is true, but everybody should be able to publish openly some prices to outline their pricing framework.
Check out more details on my Architectural and Real Estate Photography & Pricing page.
‘Standard’ vs ‘Advanced’ projects?
Would it make sense to offer different levels of projects, like ‘standard’ or ‘advanced’ projects for different types of properties?
I can only perform at the same quality level for all types of properties, I have ‘no switch’ for lower priced homes or luxury properties. I apply the same diligence and skill-set to all projects — I am using the same quality tools for all types of projects. I see a differentiation in the amount of time and effort you can put into a project.
I understand that high-end properties often have ‘features’ that you might want to emphasize: e.g. details or natural lighting at different times of day which translates to trying to have the ideal light for more than one exterior facades or room, etc. – it all comes down to the amount of time that I have available to complete the photo shoot.
Even the smallest project is not done in an hour! What’s involved: going to location, taking time to take the photos and deciding for angles that work, most often arrange some items in the home differently to make the shot better, going back and download, pre-select and post-process them, making them client-ready, resizing, uploading, etc… A one-hour photo shoot on location leads to may be 3 or 4 hours total project time. So, I don’t have an hourly rate of hundreds of dollars, actually it goes down dramatically the more time I need. I am not a ‘minute-counter’ on location and I rather take more photos than less on location to later find the best angle — if I feel that I can optimize the room in order to better present on a photo, I will take the time to do that.
That might make clear that the price can’t go lower – at least not for me. If you find a person who does it for less then he/she works likely at the national minimum wage boundary and you might ask yourself why he/she does that and what you’ll get. May be it is just a side job. Or… he / she is an employed photographer — on sites like indeed.com you can find statistics of photography businesses (with salaried photographers or on-demand photographers) and those employees reported their hourly wages which are so low that ‘state minimum wage’ is the proper description.
The photos I am taking and deliver are of highest quality and can be used for any purpose like website use and MLS listings, but also for high-end portfolios, brochures, etc.
More complex photo shoots: consultation and prep-work
Some complex projects require a little bit of pre-planning and special attention on scene. If you have a more complex high-end project in progress, let’s say you have requirements written down in a punch-list, e.g. certain detail shots, certain angles, certain requirements from your marketing or design folks, I am adding an in-depth consultation and prep fee to projects for the reason that I will go through your requirement list and may have questions or suggestions, and need extra time to make sure the project is done right the first time.
Imagine you are a builder and want to sell luxury condos in Boulder downtown and the pricing is at the top of the market … then you need photos that warrant that ambition.
What’s the conclusion? You should give me all the input which is available, e.g. your goals, requirements, … otherwise, you might get some great photos but your designer / sales expert is unhappy because certain motives are missing in the mix or the format (landscape / portrait) is not optimal. There’s no luxury object photo shooting out there which had cost just some petty cash.
↦Want to read some more about this topic? Here’s related information: Photography for Real Estate, Interior Designers, Staging Firms, Builders, and Architects
Other stuff I can help with
My professional background is diverse and I could help you to solve some other related tasks: I do video work, I am a Photoshop expert and can make your photos what you want them to be, and I am available for your technical and creative questions.